Trademark search for:

NIDA FLOW

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2005-11-17 — Application filed
2005-11-23 — Application filed
2006-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-05-25 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-25 — Final disposition recorded
2006-11-10 — Office action issued
2006-11-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-11-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-11-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-11-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-11-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-12-06 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-06 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-03 — Notice of publication
2007-01-23 — Published for opposition
2007-04-10 — Registered-principal register
2011-05-05 — Teas section 7 request received
2011-05-06 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-05-07 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
2011-08-11 — Office action issued
2011-08-13 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2011-08-13 — Sec 7 request filed
2011-08-24 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2017-11-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-11-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

3M COMPANY
ST. PAUL , MN

Nida-Core Corporation
Port St. Lucie , FL

Nida-Core Corporation
Port St. Lucie , FL

Nida-Core Corporation
Port St. Lucie , FL

Correspondent

MICHAEL L. GANNON 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
3M CENTER, 2501 HUDSON ROAD
BLDG. 220-9E-01
ST. PAUL, MN 55144

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-11-17

Status Date:
2017-11-17

Category:
Rubber & Plastics

Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.