Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
1971 ›
HA ›
HARLEQUIN READER SERVICE
Trademark search for:
HARLEQUIN READER SERVICE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1971-06-15 — Application filed
1979-02-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
1993-07-13 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2003-02-27 — Paper received
2003-02-27 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2003-04-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2003-04-02 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-03-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-03-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-06-10 — Notice of suit
2008-09-02 — Case file in ticrs
2013-09-10 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2013-09-10 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2013-09-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2013-09-11 — Registered and renewed (third renewal - 10 yrs)
2013-09-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2018-06-08 — Teas change of owner address received
2018-06-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-03-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-09-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-09-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
HARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Toronto, Ontario CA
Correspondent
Karen Louie Harlequin Enterprises Limited 225 Duncan Mill Road Toronto, Ontario, M3B3K9 CANADA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1971-06-15
Status Date:
2023-09-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.