Brandinium

Trademark search for:

UNIFORMS THAT WORK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1988-12-27 — Application filed
  • 1989-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1989-03-08 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1989-03-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1989-05-13 — Notice of publication
  • 1989-06-13 — Published for opposition
  • 1989-09-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 1994-12-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1995-08-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2006-05-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-20 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2008-09-10 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-10-23 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2009-10-26 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2009-10-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-03-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-03-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-09-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2021-10-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CINTAS HOLDINGS LLC
MASON , OH
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3
SPARKS , NV
VAN DYNE-CROTTY, INC.
DAYTON , OH
VAN DYNE-CROTTY, INC.
DAYTON , OH
VAN DYNE-CROTTY, INC.
DAYTON , OH

Correspondent

Cheryl S. Scotney Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL
1 East Fourth Street
Suite 1400
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1988-12-27
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Category:
Science & Technology Services
Filing Year:
1988

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.