Trademark search for:

LAWYERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING LADD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1991-04-29 — Application filed
1991-07-15 — Assigned to examiner
1991-07-30 — Assigned to examiner
1991-08-13 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-08-27 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1991-08-30 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-09-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-03-06 — Notice of publication
1992-04-07 — Published for opposition
1993-04-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-06-07 — Use amendment filed
1993-07-20 — Statement of use processing complete
1993-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
1993-07-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1993-10-12 — Registered-principal register
1993-11-19 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
1993-12-06 — Response received to post reg. action
1994-02-22 — Reprinting registration certificate
1998-09-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1999-01-19 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
1999-10-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2001-01-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2004-07-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2004-07-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Lawyers Against Drunk Driving, P.C.
Farmington Hills , MI

Lawyers Against Drunk Driving, P.C.
Southfield , MI

Lawyers Against Drunk Driving, P.C.
Southfield , MI

Correspondent

SHELDON L KAY
30445 NORTHWESTERN HWY
STE 320
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1991-04-29

Status Date:
2004-07-17

Category:
Science & Technology Services

Filing Year:
1991

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.