Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
1992 ›
CH ›
CHLITINA C
Trademark search for:
CHLITINA C
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1992-11-25 — Application filed
1993-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
1993-02-18 — Assigned to examiner
1993-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
1993-06-03 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-06-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-06-30 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1993-06-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-08-13 — Notice of publication
1993-09-14 — Published for opposition
1993-12-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1994-03-30 — Sou extension 1 filed
1994-05-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
1994-12-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
1995-01-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
1995-05-30 — Sou extension 3 filed
1995-07-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
1995-11-29 — Sou extension 4 filed
1996-02-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
1996-05-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
1996-08-17 — Sou extension 5 granted
1996-12-04 — Use amendment filed
1997-02-04 — Statement of use processing complete
1997-02-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1997-04-29 — Registered-principal register
2004-01-31 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2004-01-31 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CHLITINA INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORPORATION
Taipei TW
CHLITINA INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORPORATION
Taipei TW
CHLITINA INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORPORATION
Taipei TW
Correspondent
DONALD C CASEY LOWE PRICE LEBLANC & BECKER 99 CANAL CTR PLZ STE 300 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1992-11-25
Status Date:
2004-01-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.