Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
1997 ›
LO ›
LOTUSLINK
Trademark search for:
LOTUSLINK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-03-10 — Application filed
1997-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
1997-10-23 — Final disposition recorded
1998-04-23 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-06-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
1998-08-07 — Notice of publication
1998-09-08 — Published for opposition
1998-12-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1999-05-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
1999-06-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
1999-12-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
2000-01-18 — Sou extension 2 granted
2000-05-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
2000-11-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2000-12-01 — Sou extension 4 filed
2001-05-31 — Sou extension 4 granted
2001-06-01 — Sou extension 5 filed
2001-07-12 — Sou extension 5 granted
2001-12-01 — Use amendment filed
2001-12-25 — Statement of use processing complete
2002-01-04 — Assigned to examiner
2002-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
2002-03-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-07-17 — Paper received
2002-07-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-09-06 — Assigned to examiner
2003-01-13 — Office action issued
2003-09-04 — Application abandoned
2003-09-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cambridge , MA
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cambridge , MA
Correspondent
STEPHEN T KEOHANE VENABLE P O BOX 34385 WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4800 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-03-10
Status Date:
2003-09-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.