Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
1998 ›
RI ›
RITCHIE & SCOTTIE
Trademark search for:
RITCHIE & SCOTTIE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1998-02-05 — Application filed
1998-09-19 — Assigned to examiner
1998-09-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-03-22 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1999-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-04-09 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-10-07 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2000-03-23 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2000-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-03-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-08-28 — Sec. 44(d) claim deleted
2001-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-11-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-04-17 — Notice of publication
2002-05-07 — Published for opposition
2002-07-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-01-14 — Sou teas extension received
2003-01-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-03-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-07-17 — Sou teas extension received
2003-07-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-07-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-01-13 — Sou teas extension received
2004-01-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-02-04 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-07-26 — Case file in ticrs
2004-07-31 — Final status recorded
2004-09-10 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Cactus Restaurants Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia CA
Cactus Restaurants Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia CA
Correspondent
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 MARKET ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1998-02-05
Status Date:
2004-07-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.