Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
1999 ›
BE ›
BESTOFCITY.COM
Trademark search for:
BESTOFCITY.COM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-08-12 — Application filed
1999-12-15 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
2000-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-08-25 — Office action issued
2001-04-16 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2001-04-16 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2001-04-18 — Sec. 1(a) claim deleted
2001-04-18 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
2001-04-19 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2001-05-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2001-08-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
2001-08-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-09-12 — Notice of publication
2001-10-02 — Published for opposition
2001-11-01 — Extension of time to oppose received
2002-05-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-11-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-11-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
2002-11-25 — Paper received
2003-01-22 — Paper received
2003-03-24 — Paper received
2003-05-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-05-28 — Paper received
2003-06-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2003-07-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-11-29 — Final status recorded
2004-01-07 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Best of City, Inc.
Selma , AL
Best of City, Inc.
Selma , AL
Correspondent
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, PA P O BOX 1449 GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-08-12
Status Date:
2003-11-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.