Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PHILLY.COM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-05-29 — Application filed
  • 2008-06-02 — Application filed
  • 2008-06-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2008-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-09-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-03-16 — Office action issued
  • 2009-03-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-03-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-03-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-04-01 — Office action issued
  • 2009-04-01 — Office action issued
  • 2009-10-01 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-10-01 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2009-10-01 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2009-10-01 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2009-10-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-10-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-10-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-10-13 — Action denying req for recon mailed
  • 2009-12-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-05 — Action denying req for recon mailed
  • 2010-10-13 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2010-11-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-11-09 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
  • 2010-12-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-12-26 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2011-01-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-03-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-03-03 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2011-03-03 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2011-03-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-03-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-03-10 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2011-03-11 — Notice of reinstatement mailed
  • 2011-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-10-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-10-06 — Office action issued
  • 2011-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-10-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-10-17 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2011-10-20 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-11-02 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2011-11-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-11-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-01-17 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2012-02-01 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-02-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-03-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2012-03-01 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-03-06 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-03-07 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-03-08 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2012-04-10 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-10-17 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-10-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-04-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-11-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-11-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NETWORK (DIGITAL) LLC
PHILADELPHIA , PA
PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NETWORK (DIGITAL) LLC
PHILADELPHIA , PA
PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NETWORK (DIGITAL) LLC
PHILADELPHIA , PA
Philly Online, LLC
Philadelphia , PA

Correspondent

Charlie C. Lyu Woodcock Washburn LLP
2929 Arch Street
Cira Centre, 12th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-05-29
Status Date:
2018-11-16
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.