Brandinium

Trademark search for:

WAVEFRONT LASIK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-04-26 — Application filed
  • 2000-09-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2000-09-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2000-10-06 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 2000-10-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2001-04-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-04-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2001-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-01-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-01-24 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-07-15 — Paper received
  • 2002-07-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-08-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-02-03 — Paper received
  • 2003-02-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-03-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-09-17 — Paper received
  • 2003-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-10-15 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-11-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-05-18 — Paper received
  • 2004-06-04 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-06-24 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-12-29 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2004-12-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2005-08-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-08-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2005-08-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Custom Lasik Inc.
Richmond Hill, Ontario CA

Correspondent

LINDA M BYRNE MERCHANT & GOULD PC
P O BOX 2910
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-04-26
Status Date:
2005-08-11
Category:
Science & Technology Services
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.