Trademark search for:

LITVIS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2001-10-03 — Application filed
2001-12-11 — Assigned to examiner
2001-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
2002-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-06-19 — Paper received
2002-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-08-29 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-10-03 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-07 — Paper received
2002-10-07 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2002-10-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
2003-04-10 — Office action issued
2003-04-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-06-06 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-06-09 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-06-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-07-23 — Notice of publication
2003-08-12 — Published for opposition
2003-11-04 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-04-28 — Sou teas extension received
2004-04-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-05-05 — Case file in ticrs
2004-05-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-11-05 — Final status recorded
2005-02-02 — Application abandoned
2005-02-02 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

DIRECTED DECISIONS, INC.
CLEVELAND , OH

DIRECTED DECISIONS, INC.
CLEVELAND , OH

Litigation Visuals, Inc.
Cleveland , OH

Correspondent

SANDRA M KOENIG FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP
1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7
CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2531
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-10-03

Status Date:
2004-11-05

Category:
Science & Technology Services

Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.