Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2002 ›
BL ›
BLACKHATVSWHITEHAT.COM
Trademark search for:
BLACKHATVSWHITEHAT.COM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-08-01 — Application filed
2002-12-16 — Assigned to examiner
2003-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2003-03-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-07-23 — Paper received
2003-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-08-13 — Case file in ticrs
2003-08-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2004-04-08 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-02-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2005-08-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-03-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-10-30 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-05-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-05-10 — Assigned to lie
2007-11-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-05-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-19 — Application abandoned
2009-02-19 — Application abandoned
2009-02-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Clarity Digital Commerce Corporation
Tempe , AZ
Correspondent
DOUGLAS E WHITE ACRONATIONAL LAW FIRM 14 CAMINO SOBRANTE ORINDA, CA 94563 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-08-01
Status Date:
2009-02-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.