Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-03-12 — Application filed
  • 2002-06-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-06-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-02-11 — Paper received
  • 2003-02-21 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2003-02-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2003-04-10 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2003-04-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-05-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-06-20 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-07-21 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-07-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-09-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2003-09-25 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-10-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-10-29 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-11-18 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-02-10 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-06-08 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2010-09-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2010-09-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
Choctaw , MS
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
Choctaw , MS
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
Choctaw , MS

Correspondent

JIM CLANCY TRIBAL ATTORNEY GENERAL
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
P O BOX 6010
CHOCTAW, MS 39350

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-03-12
Status Date:
2010-09-17
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.