Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SAV INTERFACE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-02-19 — Application filed
  • 2003-05-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-11-24 — Paper received
  • 2003-11-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-01-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-07-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2005-01-06 — Paper received
  • 2005-01-06 — Divisional request received
  • 2005-02-08 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2005-06-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-07-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-07-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-08-04 — Office action issued
  • 2005-08-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-08-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-08-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-08-11 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2006-02-13 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-02-14 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2006-09-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-09-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-10-04 — Fax received
  • 2006-10-04 — Fax sent
  • 2006-10-04 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2006-11-07 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2006-11-07 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2006-11-25 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2006-11-27 — Fax received
  • 2006-12-23 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-12-23 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-01-19 — Paper received
  • 2007-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-23 — Petition granted - response received
  • 2007-01-31 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-01-31 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-02-01 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2007-06-18 — Paper received
  • 2007-06-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-06-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-06-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-06-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-12-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-01-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-01-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-07-02 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-07-02 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2008-07-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-07-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-07-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-08-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-08-27 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-09-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-12-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-06-09 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2009-07-13 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-07-13 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-09-03 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-09-03 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-09-08 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-09-08 — New noa to issue
  • 2009-10-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-12-01 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-12-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-12-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-07-23 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-07-23 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-07-23 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Sophos plc
Abingdon, Oxfordshire GB
Sophos plc
Abingdon, Oxfordshire GB

Correspondent

SOPHOS PLC
THE PENTAGON ABINGDON SCIENCE PARK
ABINGDON, OX14 3YP
UNITED KINGDOM

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-02-19
Status Date:
2010-07-23
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.