Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2004 ›
SA ›
SARVEGA, THE XML NETWORKING COMPANY
Trademark search for:
SARVEGA, THE XML NETWORKING COMPANY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-02-10 — Application filed
2004-02-23 — Application filed
2004-09-01 — Assigned to examiner
2004-09-07 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action entered
2004-09-07 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2004-09-07 — Examiner's amendment and/or priority action e-mailed
2004-09-13 — Office action issued
2004-09-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-09-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2004-10-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-11-01 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-03 — Law office publication review completed
2004-12-22 — Notice of publication
2005-01-11 — Published for opposition
2005-04-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-09-20 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-10-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-03-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-03-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-04-05 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2006-04-06 — Final status recorded
2006-06-09 — Application abandoned
2006-06-09 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Sarvega, Inc.
Burr Ridge , IL
Sarvega, Inc.
Burr Ridge , IL
Correspondent
KATHERINE M BASILE HOWREY LLP 2941 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 200-300 FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-02-10
Status Date:
2006-04-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.