Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2004 ›
SY ›
SYMCEPTS
Trademark search for:
SYMCEPTS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-06-15 — Application filed
2004-06-22 — Application filed
2005-01-18 — Assigned to examiner
2005-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
2005-04-06 — Office action issued
2005-04-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-04-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-04-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-04-29 — Assigned to lie
2005-05-03 — Law office publication review completed
2005-05-05 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-17 — Notice of publication
2005-09-06 — Published for opposition
2005-11-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-05-23 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-06-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-07-13 — Teas statement of use received
2006-07-13 — Use amendment filed
2006-08-09 — Statement of use processing complete
2006-08-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-08-11 — Assigned to lie
2006-08-16 — Law office registration review completed
2006-10-03 — Registered-principal register
2013-05-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2013-05-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Symrise GmbH & Co. KG
Holzminden DE
Symrise GmbH & Co. KG
Holzminden DE
Symrise GmbH & Co. KG
Holzminden DE
Correspondent
STANLEY C MACEL, III ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP P O BOX 2207 WILMINGTON, DE 19899 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-06-15
Status Date:
2013-05-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.