Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2005 ›
AP ›
APPFORCE
Trademark search for:
APPFORCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-08-31 — Application filed
2005-09-09 — Application filed
2006-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-06 — Assigned to examiner
2006-04-07 — Office action issued
2006-04-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-04-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-04-14 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-19 — Law office publication review completed
2006-05-17 — Notice of publication
2006-06-06 — Published for opposition
2006-08-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-02-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-08-28 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-08-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-01-28 — Sou teas extension received
2008-01-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-01-28 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-08-26 — Sou teas extension received
2008-08-26 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-08-26 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Final status recorded
2010-08-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
salesforce.com, inc.
San Francisco , CA
salesforce.com, inc.
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
Heather A. Dunn DLA Piper LLP US 555 Mission St, 24th Fl. San Francisco, CA 94105 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-08-31
Status Date:
2009-03-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.