Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2006 ›
EV ›
EVIDENCE BASED COMPUTER ASSISTED CODING
Trademark search for:
EVIDENCE BASED COMPUTER ASSISTED CODING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-11-27 — Application filed
2006-11-30 — Application filed
2007-03-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
2007-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
2007-10-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-10-02 — Office action issued
2007-11-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-11-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-11-01 — Assigned to lie
2007-11-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-11-15 — Law office publication review completed
2007-11-28 — Notice of publication
2007-12-18 — Published for opposition
2008-03-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-09-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-09-24 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-09-24 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-09-24 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-09-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-12-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-12-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-02-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-02-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-03-11 — Paper received
2009-03-11 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-03-16 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-09-11 — Paper received
2009-09-11 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-09-17 — Office action issued
2009-10-01 — Paper received
2009-10-07 — Use amendment filed
2009-10-07 — Statement of use processing complete
2009-10-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-10-16 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-16 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-11 — Paper received
2010-03-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-03-19 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-03-20 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-03-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2010-03-21 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2010-04-16 — Paper received
2010-05-05 — Amendment from applicant entered
2010-05-05 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-23 — Office action issued
2010-11-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-11-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-12-21 — Office action issued
2010-12-21 — Office action issued
2011-06-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-06-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-06-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-06-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-06-15 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-06-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-06-15 — Su-examiner's amendment written
2011-06-16 — Law office registration review completed
2011-06-17 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-07-19 — Registered-principal register
2012-05-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-05-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-07-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-02-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-02-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CodeRyte, Inc.
Bethesda , MD
CodeRyte, Inc.
Bethesda , MD
CodeRyte
Bethesda , MD
Correspondent
James F. Voegeli 3M Innovative Properties Company, Attorney for Cod 3M Center, 2501 Hudson Road 220 9E 01 St. Paul, MN 55144
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-11-27
Status Date:
2018-02-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.