Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2006 ›
PA ›
PARCOMET
Trademark search for:
PARCOMET
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-06-09 — Application filed
2010-06-14 — Application filed
2010-06-15 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2010-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
2010-09-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-09-28 — Assigned to lie
2010-09-28 — Law office publication review completed
2010-11-02 — Published for opposition
2010-11-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-12-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2011-06-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-06-27 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-06-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-12-27 — Sou teas extension received
2011-12-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-01-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-01-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-01-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2012-06-27 — Sou extension 3 filed
2012-07-11 — Sou extension 3 granted
2012-07-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-12-28 — Sou teas extension received
2012-12-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
2013-01-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
2013-01-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-07-29 — Application abandoned
2013-07-29 — Application abandoned
2013-07-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Parsons Corporation
Parsons Corporation
Correspondent
JEFFREY G. SHELDON SHELDON MAK ROSE & ANDERSON
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
