Trademark search for:

PLOTRX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-03-10 — Application filed
2006-03-16 — Application filed
2006-04-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-04-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-08-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-08-28 — Assigned to examiner
2006-09-01 — Assigned to lie
2006-09-05 — Law office publication review completed
2006-09-27 — Notice of publication
2006-10-17 — Published for opposition
2007-01-02 — Registered-principal register
2010-03-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-03-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-12-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-12-19 — Teas section 8 received
2012-12-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-12-31 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2012-12-31 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2013-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-01-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2016-10-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-11-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-08-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-08-04 — Final status recorded
2017-08-29 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

Crafton Engineering, P.C.
Memphis , TN

Crafton Engineering, P.C.
Memphis , TN

Crafton Engineering, P.C.
Memphis , TN

Correspondent

David M. Lilenfeld, Esq. Lilenfeld PC
3379 Peachtree Road NE
Suite 980
ATLANTA, GA 30326

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-03-10

Status Date:
2017-08-04

Category:
Science & Technology Services

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.