Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VERENIUM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-06-06 — Application filed
  • 2007-06-12 — Application filed
  • 2007-06-13 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2007-07-09 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-07-09 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2007-07-11 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2007-08-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-01-25 — Office action issued
  • 2008-01-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-01-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-01-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-02-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-02-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-03-07 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2008-03-14 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-03-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-03-14 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-03-14 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-03-14 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-03-14 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-03-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-04-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-04-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-07-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-01-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-01-20 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-01-20 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-01-20 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-02-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-02-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-06-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-10 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-07-10 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2009-07-10 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-07-10 — Divisional request received
  • 2009-07-16 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2009-07-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-07-17 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2009-09-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-09-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-09-28 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-09-29 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-11-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-08-31 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2012-08-31 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2012-12-19 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-05-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-05-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-08-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2015-11-03 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2016-01-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-01-06 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2016-01-06 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2018-11-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-06-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-06-05 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BASF ENZYMES LLC
SAN DIEGO , CA
VERENIUM CORPORATION
San Diego , CA
VERENIUM CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO , CA
VERENIUM CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO , CA
Diversa Corporation
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

Sarah M. Robertson Dorsey & Whitney LLP
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6119
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-06-06
Status Date:
2020-06-05
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.