Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2009 ›
CA ›
CANOPY WOOD
Trademark search for:
CANOPY WOOD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-09-25 — Application filed
2009-11-19 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2009-11-23 — Application filed
2009-11-27 — Application filed
2009-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-23 — Assigned to examiner
2009-12-24 — Office action issued
2009-12-29 — Office action issued
2009-12-29 — Office action issued
2010-01-22 — Office action issued
2010-06-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-06-28 — Office action issued
2010-06-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-06-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-08-16 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-17 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-21 — Application abandoned
2011-03-21 — Application abandoned
2011-04-20 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-04-20 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2011-05-06 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2012-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-13 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-03 — New representative at ib received
2019-09-25 — Final status recorded
2020-04-17 — Death of international registration
2020-04-18 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Correspondent
Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner 1700 Diagonal Rd Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-09-25
Status Date:
2019-09-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.