Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MOBIZOU

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-06-08 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-11 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-11 — Application filed
  • 2009-08-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-03 — Priority action written
  • 2009-09-03 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2009-09-03 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2009-09-09 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-09-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-09-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-09-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-09-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-10-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-10-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-01-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-11-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-12-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-08-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-08-12 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-01-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-01-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-02-05 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

Barabas, Arpad D.
Calgary, Alberta CA
Barabas, Arpad D.
Calgary, Alberta CA
Barabas, Arpad D.
Calgary, Alberta CA

Correspondent

MOSHE D. LAPIN NATOLI-LEGAL, LLC
305 Broadway
7th Floor
NEW YORK, NY 10007

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-06-08
Status Date:
2016-08-12
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.