Brandinium

Trademark search for:

POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-09-22 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-25 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-25 — Application filed
  • 2009-12-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-23 — Office action issued
  • 2010-07-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-07-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-07-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-07-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2011-01-18 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-01-18 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-02-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-02-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-02-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-02-04 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2011-08-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-08-05 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2011-08-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-08-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-08-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-08-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-08-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2012-03-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-03-06 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2012-03-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-04-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-04-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-04-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-04-13 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2012-11-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-11-12 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-11-13 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2012-11-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-12-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-12-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-12-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2013-01-29 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2013-02-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-02-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-02-27 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-27 — Office action issued
  • 2013-02-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-03-05 — Undeliverable mail - corresp. remailed
  • 2013-08-27 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2013-08-27 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2013-08-27 — Office action issued
  • 2013-08-27 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2013-09-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-09-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-09-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-09-22 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2013-09-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-10-09 — Notice of publication
  • 2013-10-29 — Published for opposition
  • 2014-01-14 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-06-27 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-06-27 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2019-01-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2020-08-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2020-08-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario CA

Correspondent

CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN WINSTEAD PC
PO BOX 131851
DALLAS, TX 75313
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-09-22
Status Date:
2020-08-21
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.