Brandinium

Trademark search for:

RENTJUICE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-03-06 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-10 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-10 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-11 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2009-05-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-09 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-01-05 — Priority action written
  • 2010-01-05 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2010-01-05 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2010-07-06 — Office action issued
  • 2010-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-07-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-07-08 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2010-07-12 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-07-12 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2010-08-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-08-05 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-08-05 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-10-08 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2010-10-14 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-10-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-11-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-11-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-12-07 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-12-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-08-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2011-08-05 — Paper received
  • 2011-08-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-08-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-08-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-08-31 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-08-31 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2011-08-31 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-08-31 — Divisional request received
  • 2011-09-06 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2011-09-06 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-09-07 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2011-09-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-09-24 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-09-27 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-11-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-07-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-07-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-08-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-07-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-11-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-06-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-06-08 — Final status recorded
  • 2023-09-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-09-29 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2023-09-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-09-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-09-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-09-29 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains

Owner Information

ZILLOW, INC.
Seattle , WA
RentJuice Corporation
San Francisco , CA
RentJuice Corporation
San Francisco , CA
RentJuice Corporation
San Francisco , CA

Correspondent

Elizabeth Zidones
1301 Second Avenue, Floor 36
Seattle, WA 98101
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-03-06
Status Date:
2018-06-08
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.