Trademark search for:

SITROF

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2010-05-10 — Application filed
2010-05-13 — Application filed
2010-05-14 — Application filed
2010-08-22 — Assigned to examiner
2010-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-31 — Office action issued
2010-08-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-09-03 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-09-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-03 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-09-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-09-15 — Assigned to lie
2010-09-15 — Law office publication review completed
2010-10-19 — Published for opposition
2010-10-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-01-04 — Registered-principal register
2016-01-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-01-11 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2017-02-22 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2017-08-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-08-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

EMC CORPORATION
HOPKINTON , MA

Sitrof Technologies, Inc.
Princeton , NJ

Sitrof Technologies, Inc.
Princeton , NJ

Sitrof Technologies, Inc.
Princeton , NJ

Correspondent

SITROF TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SITROF TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
700 ALEXANDER PARK STE 302
PRINCETON, NJ 08540-6351
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-05-10

Status Date:
2017-08-11

Category:
Science & Technology Services

Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.