Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2011 ›
DI ›
DICOMSYS
Trademark search for:
DICOMSYS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-11-17 — Application filed
2011-11-21 — Application filed
2011-11-23 — Application filed
2011-11-24 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-03-05 — Assigned to examiner
2012-03-08 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-08 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-08 — Final disposition recorded
2012-06-22 — Office action issued
2012-06-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-06-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-07-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-08-01 — Assigned to lie
2012-08-06 — Law office publication review completed
2012-08-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-09-11 — Published for opposition
2012-09-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-11-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-05-03 — Sou teas extension received
2013-05-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-05-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-05-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-05-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-05-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2013-12-09 — Application abandoned
2013-12-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dicom Systems, Inc
San Jose , CA
Dicom Systems, Inc
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
DICOM SYSTEMS, INC 687 Azule Avenue SAN JOSE, CA 95123 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-11-17
Status Date:
2013-12-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.