Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2011 ›
FI ›
FIGHTERTOOLS
Trademark search for:
FIGHTERTOOLS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-09-21 — Application filed
2011-09-24 — Application filed
2011-09-26 — Application filed
2011-09-27 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-01-09 — Assigned to examiner
2012-01-11 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2012-01-11 — Removed from teas plus
2012-01-11 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2012-01-11 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2012-01-11 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action automatic entry
2012-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-03-13 — Office action issued
2012-03-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-03-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-03-31 — Assigned to lie
2012-03-31 — Law office publication review completed
2012-04-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-05-08 — Published for opposition
2012-05-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-07-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-01-02 — Sou teas extension received
2013-01-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-01-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2013-01-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-02-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-07-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2013-07-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2013-07-10 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2013-07-10 — Petition to revive-granted
2013-07-10 — Teas petition to revive received
2013-07-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-08-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
2013-08-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-01-03 — Sou teas extension received
2014-01-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2014-01-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
2014-01-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-07-03 — Sou extension 4 filed
2014-07-11 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2014-07-11 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2014-07-11 — Petition to revive-granted
2014-07-11 — Teas petition to revive received
2014-07-18 — Sou extension 4 granted
2014-07-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-12-29 — Sou teas extension received
2014-12-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
2014-12-29 — Sou extension 5 granted
2014-12-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-06-12 — Teas statement of use received
2015-06-12 — Use amendment filed
2015-06-20 — Statement of use processing complete
2015-06-22 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2015-06-23 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2015-07-28 — Registered-principal register
2020-07-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2020-11-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-11-16 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
2020-11-16 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-11-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-11-16 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-11-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-11-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-11-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-11-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-02-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-02-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SPAMfighter ApS
COPENHAGEN NV DK
SPAMfighter ApS
COPENHAGEN NV DK
SPAMfighter ApS
COPENHAGEN NV DK
Correspondent
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PA P.O. Box 398538 c/o TrademarkRenewals.com Miami Beach, FL 33239-8538
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-09-21
Status Date:
2022-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.