Brandinium

Trademark search for:

INTERNATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-10-05 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-16 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2012-02-21 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-02-25 — Application filed
  • 2012-02-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-02-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-28 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-24 — Office action issued
  • 2012-04-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-04-18 — Office action issued
  • 2012-04-23 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-04-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-04-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-05-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-05-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-05-17 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-05-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-05-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-05-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-05-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-05-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-05-31 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
  • 2012-06-18 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2012-07-02 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2012-07-24 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-07-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-07-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-07-24 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-07-24 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-08-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-08-22 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2012-08-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-08-22 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2012-09-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-09-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-10-07 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2012-10-11 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2013-01-10 — Office action issued
  • 2013-01-10 — Office action issued
  • 2013-01-11 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2013-02-08 — Office action issued
  • 2013-07-24 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2013-07-24 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2013-07-24 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2013-08-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-11-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-12-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-06-23 — New representative at ib received
  • 2018-08-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-02-26 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2021-08-28 — New representative at ib received
  • 2021-10-06 — Final status recorded
  • 2021-10-26 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2021-12-20 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2021-12-20 — Invalidation processed
  • 2022-01-21 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2022-04-23 — Death of international registration
  • 2022-04-24 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

International Osteoporosis Foundation
CH-1260 Nyon CH
International Osteoporosis Foundation
CH-1260 Nyon CH
International Osteoporosis Foundation
CH-1260 Nyon CH

Correspondent

LEWIS F GOULD JR DUANE MORRIS LLP
30 SOUTH 17TH STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-10-05
Status Date:
2021-10-06
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.