Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2011 ›
RE ›
RELEVENZ
Trademark search for:
RELEVENZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-04-19 — Application filed
2011-04-22 — Application filed
2011-04-22 — Application filed
2011-07-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-07-26 — Assigned to examiner
2011-08-30 — Published for opposition
2011-08-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-10-25 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-04-24 — Sou teas extension received
2012-04-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-04-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-04-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-05-21 — Teas statement of use received
2012-05-21 — Use amendment filed
2012-06-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-06-18 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-06-22 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-07-12 — Assigned to lie
2012-07-13 — Law office registration review completed
2012-07-14 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2012-08-21 — Registered-principal register
2017-08-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-03-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-03-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Revelenz Software Limited
Dublin 24 IE
Revelenz Software Limited
Dublin 24 IE
Revelenz Software Limited
Dublin 24 IE
Correspondent
JOHN R. HARRIS MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP 3343 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1600 ATLANTA, GA 30326-1044 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-04-19
Status Date:
2019-03-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.