Brandinium

Trademark search for:

AIX AMERICAN INTERNET EXCHANGE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-03-28 — Application filed
  • 2012-03-31 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-04 — Application filed
  • 2012-04-05 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2012-07-07 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-01-14 — Fax received
  • 2013-01-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-01-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2013-01-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-08-21 — Office action issued
  • 2013-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-08-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-09-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-09-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-09-12 — Office action issued
  • 2014-01-13 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2014-01-13 — Divisional request received
  • 2014-01-16 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-01-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-01-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2014-01-30 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2014-01-31 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
  • 2014-02-20 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2014-02-20 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2014-02-20 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2014-03-12 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-03-12 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2014-03-12 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-03-12 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2014-03-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-04-03 — Data modification completed
  • 2014-04-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-04-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-04-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-10-03 — Office action issued
  • 2014-10-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2014-10-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-11-03 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2014-11-03 — Use amendment filed
  • 2014-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-11-22 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2014-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-11-25 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
  • 2015-06-24 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-06-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-06-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-06-24 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-06-24 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-06-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-07-08 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-07-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-07-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-10-13 — Registered-principal register
  • 2020-10-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-04-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2022-04-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Technology Advancement Group, Inc.
Dulles , VA
Technology Advancement Group, Inc.
Dulles , VA
Technology Advancement Group, Inc.
Dulles , VA

Correspondent

DAVID L MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP
401 9TH ST NW
STE 900
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-03-28
Status Date:
2022-04-29
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.