Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2012 ›
BE ›
BESAFER
Trademark search for:
BESAFER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-07-26 — Application filed
2012-07-30 — Application filed
2012-08-02 — Application filed
2012-08-03 — Notice of design search code mailed
2012-11-23 — Assigned to examiner
2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-27 — Office action issued
2013-03-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-04-19 — Suspension letter written
2013-04-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-04-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-10-22 — Assigned to lie
2013-10-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-05-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-11-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-06-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-12-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
2016-01-26 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-23 — Application abandoned
2016-08-23 — Application abandoned
2016-08-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Martinez Martinez, Estanislao
Burguillos (Sevilla) ES
Correspondent
ROBERT C. FABER OSTROLENK FABER LLP 1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7 NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-07-26
Status Date:
2016-08-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.