Brandinium

Trademark search for:

S SCHMERSAL SAFE SOLUTIONS FOR YOUR INDUSTRY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-08-06 — Application filed
  • 2013-12-12 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2013-12-14 — Application filed
  • 2013-12-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-12-18 — Application filed
  • 2013-12-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-12-22 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2013-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-01-17 — Office action issued
  • 2014-03-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-03-28 — Office action issued
  • 2014-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-04-22 — Office action issued
  • 2014-04-22 — Office action issued
  • 2014-10-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-10-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-10-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-21 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2014-10-21 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-10-21 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2015-01-05 — Office action issued
  • 2015-01-05 — Office action issued
  • 2015-01-05 — Office action issued
  • 2015-03-17 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2015-03-24 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2015-04-22 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-04-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-04-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-04-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-04-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-04-24 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2015-05-13 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2015-05-13 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2015-05-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-05-19 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-06-01 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2015-06-03 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2015-06-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-06-03 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2015-06-20 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2015-06-23 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-06-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-09-08 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-12-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-01-29 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
  • 2016-01-29 — Generic madrid transaction created
  • 2016-03-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-09-08 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2022-03-07 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
  • 2022-07-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-07-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-07-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-08-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2022-08-05 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2022-08-05 — Registered - sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2023-08-05 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-03-03 — Death of international registration
  • 2024-03-03 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG
Wuppertal DE
K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG
DE
K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG
DE

Correspondent

Marlene J. Williams Buchalter, A Professional Corporation
425 Market Street, Suite 2900
San Francisco, CA 94105
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-08-06
Status Date:
2023-08-05
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.