Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2014 ›
CL ›
CLARIT-MD
Trademark search for:
CLARIT-MD
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-04-15 — Application filed
2014-04-18 — Application filed
2014-04-29 — Application filed
2014-04-30 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
2014-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-08-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-09-02 — Published for opposition
2014-09-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-10-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-04-22 — Sou teas extension received
2015-04-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
2015-05-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-05-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2015-05-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-10-28 — Sou teas extension received
2015-10-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2015-11-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-11-09 — Sou extension 2 granted
2015-11-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-04-22 — Sou teas extension received
2016-04-22 — Sou extension 3 filed
2016-04-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
2016-04-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-11-28 — Application abandoned
2016-11-28 — Application abandoned
2016-11-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
THEMEDICALMEMORY, LLC
Phoenix , AZ
THEMEDICALMEMORY, LLC
Phoenix , AZ
Correspondent
JONATHAN A COURY HOOL COURY LAW, PLC 2398 E CAMELBACK RD STE 1020 PHOENIX, AZ 85016-9022 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-04-15
Status Date:
2016-11-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.