Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2015 ›
SI ›
SITTERSYNC
Trademark search for:
SITTERSYNC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-07-13 — Application filed
2015-07-16 — Application filed
2015-07-17 — Application filed
2015-07-18 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-10-22 — Assigned to examiner
2015-10-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-11-11 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-12-01 — Published for opposition
2015-12-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-01-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-07-13 — Sou teas extension received
2016-07-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-07-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-07-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-01-20 — Sou teas extension received
2017-01-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2017-01-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-01-27 — Sou extension 2 granted
2017-01-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-07-10 — Sou teas extension received
2017-07-10 — Sou extension 3 filed
2017-07-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2017-07-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-02-26 — Application abandoned
2018-02-26 — Application abandoned
2018-02-26 — Final status recorded
2018-09-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Kurtz Partners, LLC
Wilmette , IL
Kurtz Partners, LLC
Wilmette , IL
Correspondent
CHERYL DANCEY BALOUGH Balough Law Offices, LLC 20 N Clark St Ste 3300 CHICAGO, IL 60602 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-07-13
Status Date:
2018-02-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.