Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2018 ›
ET ›
ETM PAYPLUS
Trademark search for:
ETM PAYPLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2018-01-12 — Application filed
2018-01-16 — Application filed
2018-01-26 — Application filed
2018-01-27 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2018-04-23 — Assigned to examiner
2018-04-24 — Priority action written
2018-04-24 — Priority action e-mailed
2018-04-24 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2018-10-24 — Office action issued
2018-10-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-10-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-10-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-11-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2018-11-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2018-11-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2018-11-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2018-11-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-12-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2019-01-08 — Published for opposition
2019-01-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2019-03-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-04-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-04-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-10-07 — Application abandoned
2019-10-07 — Application abandoned
2019-10-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
eTouch LV, LLC
Los Angeles , CA
eTouch LV, LLC
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
Michael J. McCue Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2018-01-12
Status Date:
2019-10-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.