Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2018 ›
PR ›
PROTOS BLOCKCHAIN
Trademark search for:
PROTOS BLOCKCHAIN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2018-01-24 — Application filed
2018-01-27 — Application filed
2018-02-05 — Application filed
2018-05-07 — Assigned to examiner
2018-05-14 — Priority action written
2018-05-14 — Priority action e-mailed
2018-05-14 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2018-10-31 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2018-12-18 — Application abandoned
2018-12-18 — Application abandoned
2018-12-19 — Teas petition to revive received
2018-12-19 — Petition to revive-granted
2018-12-19 — Office action issued
2018-12-20 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2018-12-22 — Assigned to lie
2018-12-26 — Assigned to lie
2018-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-12-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-01-03 — Suspension letter written
2019-01-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-01-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-07-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-08-02 — Suspension inquiry written
2019-08-02 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2019-08-02 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2020-02-14 — Application abandoned
2020-02-14 — Application abandoned
2020-02-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PROTOS ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH
BAAR CH
Protos Blockchain Corp.
Vancouver, BC CA
Correspondent
PAUL L. HAVEL MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP 111 S.W. FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3400 PORTLAND, OR 97204 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2018-01-24
Status Date:
2020-02-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.