Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2018 ›
ST ›
STILL PRO 50
Trademark search for:
STILL PRO 50
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2018-08-08 — Application filed
2018-08-11 — Application filed
2018-08-15 — Application filed
2018-11-27 — Assigned to examiner
2018-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2018-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2018-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2019-05-14 — Office action issued
2019-05-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2019-05-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-07-15 — Office action issued
2019-07-15 — Office action issued
2019-07-15 — Office action issued
2019-09-11 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2020-01-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2020-01-15 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2020-01-15 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2020-01-15 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2020-01-24 — Assigned to lie
2020-01-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-01-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
2020-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
2020-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
2020-09-01 — Application abandoned
2020-09-01 — Application abandoned
2020-09-01 — Final status recorded
2020-09-02 — Exparte appeal terminated
Owner Information
Fluid Quip Process Technologies, LLC
Springfield , OH
Correspondent
KATHRYN E SMITH WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP 441 VINE STREET 2700 CAREW TOWER CINCINNATI, OH 45202 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2018-08-08
Status Date:
2020-09-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.