Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Science & Technology Services ›
2021 ›
PA ›
PAGAYA PULSE
Trademark search for:
PAGAYA PULSE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2021-06-17 — Application filed
2021-06-21 — Application filed
2021-09-03 — Application filed
2022-03-09 — Assigned to examiner
2022-03-11 — Removed from teas plus
2022-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2022-04-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-04-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-04-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-09-12 — Office action issued
2022-09-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-09-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-09-15 — Data modification completed
2022-09-15 — Data modification completed
2022-09-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-09-15 — Assigned to lie
2022-10-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2022-10-26 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2022-11-15 — Published for opposition
2022-11-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2023-01-10 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2023-02-16 — Application abandoned
2023-02-17 — Application abandoned
2023-02-17 — Application abandoned
2023-02-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.
Tel Aviv IL
Pagaya Technologies Ltd.
Tel Aviv IL
Correspondent
Scott M. Sisun, Esq. Sisun Law 135 Madison Avenue, Floor 5 New York, NY 10016 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2021-06-17
Status Date:
2023-02-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.