Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
1994 ›
TE ›
TEE-COMM
Trademark search for:
TEE-COMM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1994-07-21 — Application filed
1994-12-28 — Assigned to examiner
1995-01-03 — Assigned to examiner
1995-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
1995-07-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1995-09-22 — Previous action count withdrawn
1995-11-06 — Office action issued
1996-03-18 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-05-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
1996-07-12 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1996-07-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
1997-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-02-11 — Letter of suspension mailed
1997-03-21 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
1997-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
1997-08-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
1998-04-14 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1998-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-12-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-07-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
2000-05-24 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2000-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-01-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-10-02 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2002-05-23 — Application abandoned
2002-05-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Tee-Comm Electronics Inc.
Milton, Ontario CA
Correspondent
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH 8110 GATEHOUSE RD STE 500 E FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1994-07-21
Status Date:
2002-05-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.