Trademark search for:

PAC-WEST

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1995-06-26 — Application filed
1995-11-21 — Assigned to examiner
1995-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
1996-01-11 — Correspondence received in law office
1996-02-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1996-03-08 — Notice of publication
1996-04-09 — Published for opposition
1996-07-02 — Registered-principal register
2002-06-28 — Paper received
2002-06-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2002-08-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2006-06-16 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2006-06-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2006-06-26 — Paper received
2006-06-26 — Sec 7 request filed
2006-07-25 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-09-11 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-09-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2006-09-11 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-10-02 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-10-02 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
2007-06-12 — Case file in ticrs
2011-04-07 — Teas change of owner address received
2011-04-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2019-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
2019-10-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PAC WEST TELECOMM, INC.
San Francisco , CA

PAC WEST TELECOMM, INC.
Stockton , CA

PAC WEST TELECOMM, INC.
Stockton , CA

Correspondent

DIANE J MASON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
STE 1000 555 CALIFORNIA ST
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1995-06-26

Status Date:
2019-10-15

Category:
Telecommunications

Filing Year:
1995

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.