Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
1999 ›
CH ›
CHEOP
Trademark search for:
CHEOP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-08-23 — Application filed
2000-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
2000-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2000-03-30 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-09-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
2000-10-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-06-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-09-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2001-09-19 — Examiners amendment mailed
2001-09-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-10-24 — Notice of publication
2001-11-13 — Published for opposition
2002-02-05 — Registered-principal register
2002-08-10 — Reg. cancelled - restored to pendency
2002-09-09 — Paper received
2003-04-28 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2003-10-07 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2003-10-07 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2003-10-07 — Application abandoned
2003-10-07 — Final status recorded
2003-12-07 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2003-12-07 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2003-12-23 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2003-12-23 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-05-07 — Paper received
Owner Information
MG Electronic Commerce Services GmbH
60322 Frankfurt am Main DE
MG Electronic Commerce Services GmbH
60322 Frankfurt am Main DE
MG Electronic Commerce Services GmbH
60322 Frankfurt am Main DE
Correspondent
NATHANIEL D KRAMER COBRIN & GITTES 750 LEXINGTON AVE NEW YORK, NY 10022-1200 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-08-23
Status Date:
2003-10-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.