Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2001 ›
CA ›
CAJA MADRID
Trademark search for:
CAJA MADRID
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-08-03 — Application filed
2001-09-17 — Assigned to examiner
2001-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
2002-03-28 — Paper received
2002-04-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-08-21 — Assigned to examiner
2002-12-26 — Paper received
2002-12-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-12-26 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2003-01-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-03-19 — Notice of publication
2003-04-08 — Published for opposition
2003-07-01 — Registered-principal register
2008-05-05 — Case file in ticrs
2009-10-12 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2009-10-24 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2009-10-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-04-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-04-23 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2012-05-04 — Review of correspondence complete - power of attorney entered
2014-02-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2014-02-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CAJA DE AHORROS Y MONTE DE PIEDAD DE MADRID
28013 Madrid ES
CAJA DE AHORROS Y MONTE DE PIEDAD DE MADRID
28013 Madrid ES
CAJA DE AHORROS Y MONTE DE PIEDAD DE MADRID
28013 Madrid ES
Correspondent
Natasha N. Reed HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 1 BATTERY PARK PLAZA NEW YORK, NY 10004-1482 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-08-03
Status Date:
2014-02-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.