Brandinium

Trademark search for:

AACPLUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-03-23 — Application filed
  • 2006-05-25 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2006-05-26 — Application filed
  • 2006-05-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-06-10 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-29 — Office action issued
  • 2006-07-17 — Paper received
  • 2006-07-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-07-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-08-17 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2006-08-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-08-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2006-08-18 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2006-09-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-09-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-09-27 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-10-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-10-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-11-14 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2006-11-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-04-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-04-23 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2007-05-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2007-06-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-06-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-06-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-25 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2007-10-26 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2007-11-16 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2007-12-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-12-21 — Office action issued
  • 2007-12-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-08-21 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-10-25 — Office action issued
  • 2008-10-25 — Office action issued
  • 2008-10-25 — Office action issued
  • 2009-04-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-04-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-04-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-04-27 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2009-04-27 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2009-04-27 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2009-05-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-05-11 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-05-12 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-05-27 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-06-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-07-17 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2009-09-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-12-01 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-03-23 — Final status recorded
  • 2015-10-16 — Death of international registration
  • 2015-10-16 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed

Owner Information

Dolby Germany GmbH
DE
Dolby Germany GmbH
DE
Coding Technologies GmbH
DE
Coding Technologies GmbH
DE

Correspondent

MICHAEL K HENDERSHOT BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE
PO BOX 10395
CHICAGO, IL 60610
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-03-23
Status Date:
2015-03-23
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.