Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2002 ›
WA ›
WANOLOGY
Trademark search for:
WANOLOGY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-06-24 — Application filed
2002-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
2003-04-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-05-01 — Paper received
2003-05-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-07-20 — Final disposition recorded
2004-01-23 — Paper received
2004-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-23 — Case file in ticrs
2004-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-03-22 — Office action issued
2004-09-23 — Paper received
2004-09-27 — Paper received
2004-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-10-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-11-10 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-10 — Law office publication review completed
2005-02-09 — Notice of publication
2005-03-01 — Published for opposition
2005-05-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-11-22 — Sou teas extension received
2005-11-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-11-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-05-25 — Final status recorded
2006-07-26 — Application abandoned
2006-07-26 — Application abandoned
2007-01-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Wanology, LLC
Lodi , NJ
Wanology, LLC
Lodi , NJ
Correspondent
Robert L. Powley Powley & Gibson, P.C. 304 Hudson Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10013 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-06-24
Status Date:
2006-05-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.