Brandinium

Trademark search for:

YAK JUST DIAL 10.15.945

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-08-20 — Application filed
  • 2003-01-31 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-02-27 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2003-07-15 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-08-22 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-01-07 — Paper received
  • 2004-01-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-03-23 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-04-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-06-17 — Paper received
  • 2004-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-06-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-07-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-09-08 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-09-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-12-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-12-21 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2004-12-21 — Case returned to examination
  • 2005-01-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2005-01-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-01-10 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2005-05-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-05-06 — Paper received
  • 2005-05-06 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2005-06-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-06-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2005-06-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2005-07-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2005-07-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-07-12 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-07-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-07-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-07-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-01-31 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-08-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-10-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-01-24 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2007-03-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-03-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-05-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2007-09-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-09-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-03-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-09-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-09-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-03-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-05-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-03-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-09-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-09-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-10-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-10-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-11-16 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-11-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-09-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-09-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Scarborough, Ontario CA
Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Scarborough, Ontario CA
Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Scarborough, Ontario CA

Correspondent

LEWIS F GOULD JR DUANE MORRIS LLP
ONE LIBERTY PL
PHLADELPHIA, PA 19103
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-08-20
Status Date:
2017-09-08
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.