Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2004 ›
BE ›
BENRIK
Trademark search for:
BENRIK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-07-19 — Application filed
2004-07-28 — Application filed
2005-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
2005-02-21 — Assigned to examiner
2005-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-22 — Paper received
2005-08-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-08-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-09-28 — Suspension letter written
2005-09-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
2006-04-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-11-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-11-21 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-11-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-12-20 — Suspension inquiry written
2007-12-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-12-21 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2008-04-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-04-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-04-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-04-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
2008-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-08 — Application abandoned
2008-12-08 — Application abandoned
2008-12-08 — Final status recorded
Correspondent
JEFFREY H. GREGER LOWE HAUPTMAN GILMAN & BERNER, LLP 1700 DIAGONAL ROAD SUITE 300 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2866
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-07-19
Status Date:
2008-12-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.