Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DAKSH

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-09-17 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-23 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-04-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-07-18 — Office action issued
  • 2005-07-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-07-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-08-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-08-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-09-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-02-14 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-02-14 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-02-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-02-22 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-03-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-03-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-09-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-10-05 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-10-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-05-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-05-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-05-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Daksh eServices Private Limited
Gurgaon IN

Correspondent

NEAL MADAN MADAN & SAIGAL LLC
358 FIFTH AVE STE 704
NEW YORK, NY 10001
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-09-17
Status Date:
2007-05-03
Category:
Telecommunications
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.