Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Telecommunications ›
2004 ›
ET ›
ET-COMMONS
Trademark search for:
ET-COMMONS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-18 — Application filed
2004-03-31 — Application filed
2004-09-28 — Assigned to examiner
2004-09-29 — Final disposition recorded
2004-09-29 — Final disposition recorded
2005-03-28 — Office action issued
2005-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-04-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-05-04 — Office action issued
2005-05-04 — Office action issued
2005-10-17 — Office action issued
2005-10-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-10-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-11-09 — Assigned to examiner
2005-11-15 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-11-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-11-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2005-11-18 — Assigned to lie
2005-11-21 — Law office publication review completed
2005-12-14 — Notice of publication
2006-01-03 — Published for opposition
2006-03-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-08-14 — Sou teas extension received
2006-08-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-09-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-03-29 — Final status recorded
2007-05-31 — Application abandoned
2007-05-31 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge , MA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge , MA
Correspondent
KARIN M RIVARD TECHNOLOGY LICENSING OFFICE/MIT 5 CAMBRIDGE CTR KENDALL SQ NE25-230 CAMBRIDGE, MA 2142
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-18
Status Date:
2007-03-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.