Trademark search for:

PRONTONET

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2004-12-20 — Application filed
2005-01-04 — Application filed
2005-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
2005-07-28 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-07-28 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2005-07-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2005-08-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-08-05 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-10 — Law office publication review completed
2005-08-31 — Notice of publication
2005-09-20 — Published for opposition
2005-12-13 — Registered-principal register
2009-03-18 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2009-04-13 — Request for new certificate filed
2009-04-13 — Request for new certificate filed
2009-04-13 — Paper received
2009-04-13 — Sec 7 request filed
2009-04-23 — Assigned to paralegal
2010-01-29 — New certificate under section 7 - processed
2011-10-05 — Teas section 8 received
2011-10-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-10-11 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
2014-01-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-01-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

VTX Communications, LLC
Raymondville , TX

VTX COMMUNICATIONS, L.P.
RAYMONDVILLE , TX

Grande River Communications, L.P.
Raymondville , TX

Grande River Communications, L.P.
Raymondville , TX

Grande River Communications, L.P.
Raymondville , TX

Correspondent

Clifton Bowling NAMAN, HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, LLP
8310 N. CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY., STE. 490
AUSTIN, TX 78731-1081
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-12-20

Status Date:
2014-01-13

Category:
Telecommunications

Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.